Shop More Submit  Join Login
About Deviant Artist Premium Member Posts as aegiandyad on NotTheTalk, the successor to Guardian Unlimited TalkUnited Kingdom Groups :iconfungus-and-friends: Fungus-and-Friends
Growing like a fungus
Recent Activity
Deviant for 5 Years
32 Month Premium Membership
Statistics 9,805 Deviations 14,275 Comments 70,866 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Critiques

Dusty Classic by greystarlight

Thevery first thing I noticed about the thumbnail was the perfectly aligned pair of Coca-Cola Classic six packs. Were they, or weren't ...

Spring Loaded by GrahamSym

I'm frequently amazed by what Mandelbulbers are able to extract from this particular set of fractals. Whenever I see a well rendered ar...

Geometric Intermezzo (Part 3) by Einsilbig

This work sits comfortably in its square format with not a trace of tilt or skew, a thing of right angles, muted colours and beauty. It...

The Artefact by TheChanChanMan

What was 'The Excession'? Nobody knew. That was the problem. It was a Galactic scale black swan event, certainly. Seemingly connected t...

Activity


Inside The Kew Gardens Palm House by aegiandyad
Inside The Kew Gardens Palm House
Another swiftly taken cross eye viewable stereoscopic pair taken in the Palm House at Kew. It's rarely deserted enough to do this properly and I have cut and pasted the visitor in the background who was moving. The gardener was standing still enough already. 
Loading...
Snap Shot Stereography In Kew Gardens Palm House by aegiandyad
Snap Shot Stereography In Kew Gardens Palm House
Occasionally, when the opportunity presents, I try to prove that it's possible to take a stereo 'snap', including an unwary subject. Of course, one has to be quick and the subject must be standing still, as here. It can be done.
Loading...
Stereoscopic Kew Palm House Paper Cutout Fans by aegiandyad
Stereoscopic Kew Palm House Paper Cutout Fans
A cross eye viewable stereoscopic pair taken on October 3rd 2014 in the famous Palm House at Kew.
Loading...

There is this charming story about peer review (courtesy of Spuunbenda):
Evidence on www.snopes.com and elsewhere suggests this story is probably a 1958 fabrication by one Alexander Calandra rather than an actual anecdote about Niels Bohr as related by Ernest Rutherford. It is nevertheless amusing and instructive, and an excellent answer to the question posed by the node title.
According to the legend, Bohr took a physics-degree exam at the University of Copenhagen which had the following question: "Describe how to determine the height of a skyscraper with a barometer."

Bohr replied: "You tie a long piece of string to the neck of the barometer, then lower the barometer from the roof of the skyscraper to the ground. The length of the string plus the length of the barometer will equal the height of the building."

This highly original answer so incensed the examiner that Bohr was failed immediately. He appealed on the grounds that his answer was indisputably correct, and the university appointed an independent arbiter to decide the case. The arbiter judged that the answer was indeed correct, but did not display any noticeable knowledge of physics. To resolve the problem it was decided to call the student in and allow him six minutes in which to provide a verbal answer which showed at least a minimal familiarity with the basic principles of physics.

For five minutes the student sat in silence, forehead creased in thought. The arbiter reminded him that time was running out, to which Bohr replied that he had several extremely relevant answers, but couldn't make up his mind which to use. On being advised to hurry up, he replied as follows:

"First, you could take the barometer up to the roof of the skyscraper, drop it over the edge, and measure the time it takes to reach the ground. The height of the building can then be worked out from the formula H = 0.5gt2. But bad luck on the barometer.

"Or if the sun is shining you could measure the height of the barometer, then set it on end and measure the length of its shadow. Then you measure the length of the skyscraper's shadow, and thereafter it is a simple matter of proportional arithmetic to work out the height of the skyscraper.

"But if you wanted to be highly scientific about it, you could tie a short piece of string to the barometer and swing it like a pendulum, first at ground level and then on the roof of the skyscraper. The height is worked out by the difference in the gravitational restoring force T = 2π√(l / g).

"Or if the skyscraper has an outside emergency staircase, it would be easier to walk up it and mark off the height of the skyscraper in barometer lengths, then add them up.

"If you merely wanted to be boring and orthodox about it, of course, you could use the barometer to measure the air pressure on the roof of the skyscraper and on the ground, and convert the difference in millibars into feet to give the height of the building. But since we are constantly being exhorted to exercise independence of mind and apply scientific methods, undoubtedly the best way would be to knock on the janitor's door and say to him 'If you would like a nice new barometer, I will give you this one if you tell me the height of this skyscraper'."

That is thinking outside the box from a Nobel Prize-winner. 

"What's the secret of success? Right decisions.
How do you make right decisions? Experience.
How do you gain experience? Wrong decisions."

(Posted by Slaughterteddy  and demmers)
www.theguardian.com/commentisf…

deviantID

aegiandyad
Posts as aegiandyad on NotTheTalk, the successor to Guardian Unlimited Talk
Artist
United Kingdom
We are passionate artists and art lovers with wide ranging tastes and interests. Our long range project is the creation of 'aegian' as an aesthetic hermaphrodite, trying to express the many facets of their being.

While his better half prefers to remain mysterious until she has decided how to start our journal, Mr A admits to having a London degree in Botany & Zoology and owning a succession of film and digital cameras. I am the man behind the lens, so there may not be many images of me submitted. We love beauty and I search for it amongst the mundane backgrounds of everyday reality as well as at fabulous gardens like the ones seen in some gallery pictures.

Official DAA Supporter stamp by Dark-Arts-Asylum
Interests

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconstaatsf:
staatsf Featured By Owner Oct 24, 2014
thank you for the comments and favs!
staats
Reply
:iconstaatsf:
staatsf Featured By Owner Oct 24, 2014
hi!
Reply
:iconrococokara:
Rococokara Featured By Owner Oct 23, 2014  Student General Artist
thanks for the llama
Reply
:iconukulelemoon:
UkuleleMoon Featured By Owner Oct 23, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Thank you for the Llama. It means a lot coming from such an amazing artist.
Reply
:iconellory28:
ellory28 Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Thanks for the llama! - Ellory X
Reply
:iconbluecaroline:
BlueCaroline Featured By Owner Oct 20, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Heart 
Reply
:iconjollyfranz:
JollyFranz Featured By Owner Oct 20, 2014
I featured your art here intoclassics.net/news/2014-10-…
Thank you for your works
Reply
:iconcloistering:
cloistering Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2014  Professional General Artist
:fusionrock::fusionrock: :heart: Thank you for the :+fav: on Last Scream Lost
Last Scream Lost by cloistering
Reply
:iconaspruli:
aspruli Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2014
Thank You ....:rose:....!
Reply
:iconthergothon:
thergothon Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you for the favourite :-)
Reply
Add a Comment: